3.8 Article

Evaluation of brand names of medicines: linguistic and format issues

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 231-237

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12316

关键词

drug utilization; readability issues; patient safety; FreP methodology

资金

  1. FCT [SFRH/BD/76531/2011, PEst-OE/LIN/UI0214/2013, UID/DTP/04138/2013]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/76531/2011] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Focusing on the shape of brand names of medicines in the Portuguese market, the aims of this study were: to evaluate the number of words, syllables and letters, to identify the combinations of letters that are not found in Portuguese words and to characterize the use of capital letters in these names. Methods A descriptive study was conducted using 474 randomized brand names of medicines, approximately 25% of all over-the-counter and prescribed medicines available in Portugal. The number of words, syllables and letters was automatically determined with a dedicated software. The combinations of letters that are not found in Portuguese and the use of capital letters were quantified through visual inspection. Key Findings The 474 names were formed by 615 words. 74.5% of the words comprised three or less syllables, the most common number of syllables in the Portuguese words (91%). As recommended, 81% (n = 385) names were formed by just one word, 59.2% (n = 281) of the names were composed of 5-8 letters, and 83.1% (n = 394) presented the first letter in capitals or all letters in upper case. Contrary to recommendations, 22% of the names comprised combinations of letters that are not commonly found in Portuguese words. Conclusions Given the current readability requirements, some of the Portuguese brand names of medicines should be reduced in length, adapted to the native language or capitalized. Equivalent studies are recommended in other European countries, because many brands of medicines are internationally marketed, while their development and approval should be beyond general marketing rules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据