4.7 Article

Laboratory Assessment of Hybrid Fiber and Nano-silica on Reinforced Porous Asphalt Mixtures

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 260-270

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.184

关键词

Porous asphalt; Drain down; Hybrid; Fiber; Nano-silica; Reinforced; Rutting; Tensile strength

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous Friction Course (PFC) is a hot mix asphalt with coarse-grained and the gap graded aggregate. In porous asphalt, high volume percentage of empty space has a number of advantages, including the creation of proper drainage on the road. On the other hand, the empty space decreases the resistance of the mixtures against rutting compared to mixtures with the dense aggregation. In this study, with the modification of asphalt binder by 4.5 percent of styrene butadiene styrene (SBS) and the amount of 2 and 4 percent of Nano silica and also by adding 0.5 and 1 percent of lime powder and as well as hybrid synthetic fiber to 0.4 and 0.5 percent by weight of asphalt mixtures as filler types, to improve the performance properties of modified porous asphalt mixtures, leading to a reduction in weight loss of asphalt binder and also increase the tensile strength and resistance to rutting. A combination of 0.1 and 0.2 percent of glass fibers with a 0.3 percent of polypropylene fibers, is defined as a type of hybrid fiber. In addition, the least amount of rutting failure occurs in the reinforced porous asphalt, using a combination of 0.2 percent glass fiber and 0.3 percent polypropylene. Also the most appropriate consuming asphalt binder in order to reduce drain down is also equal to 4.5 percent, that for the amount of 4 percent Nano silica in it. Moreover, by adding lime powder content used on the specimens from 0.5 percent to 1 percent, the tensile strength value could be increased about 16.5 percent for reinforced porous asphalt containing 4.5 percent asphalt binder. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据