4.0 Review

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Birth Prevalence of Orofacial Clefts in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

期刊

CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL
卷 54, 期 5, 页码 571-581

出版社

ALLIANCE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP DIVISION ALLEN PRESS
DOI: 10.1597/15-221

关键词

birth prevalence; cleft lip; cleft palate; low- and middle-income countries; systematic review

资金

  1. CHERG
  2. PGH Foundation
  3. Dundee University World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Oral Health & Craniofacial Anomalies and Technology Transfer
  4. International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In the last comprehensive review of the literature published in 2002, little information on the prevalence of orofacial clefts was available from low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Objective: To analyze published data on the birth prevalence of cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) from LMIC. Design: Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of data from original papers on the birth prevalence of cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) in LMICs between 1990 and 2014. Secondary inclusion criteria were developed to analyze lower-quality studies from countries with scarce data. Main Outcome Measure: Birth prevalence of undifferentiated CL/P (with or without associated syndrome or other anomaly). Results: Twenty-eight studies met strict inclusion criteria. Among 31,475,278 total births, the pooled birth prevalence of undifferentiated CL/P was 1.38 per 1000 births (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20 to 1.56). Four studies met criteria for secondary analysis, providing data on 75,627 births, with a pooled prevalence of 0.75 CL/P cases per 1000 births (95% CI: 0.56 to 0.95). Comparison of studies was limited by variable definitions of cases and of the reference population and by inconsistent reporting of outcomes. There is significant heterogeneity in the findings. Conclusions: In LMICs, approximately 1 in every 730 children is born with CL/P. To optimize comparability across settings, future research should use a standard classification system and standard criteria for data collection and presentation. As clefting is associated with deprivation, understanding the true scale, risks, and preventive measures for orofacial clefts in LMIC is a matter of both scientific and humanitarian importance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据