4.1 Article

Changes in IL-4 and IL-13 expression in allergic-rhinitis treated with hydrogen-rich saline in guinea-pig model

期刊

ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 350-355

出版社

ELSEVIER DOYMA SL
DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2016.10.007

关键词

Allergic rhinitis; Hydrogen-rich saline; Immunofluorescence; IgE; Ovalbumin

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Tongji Hospital [JYB1302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Medical gas hydrogen (H-2) has a special role in airway inflammation; however, the effect of H-2 on allergic rhinitis (AR) remains unclear. This study explored the possible roles of H-2 on the pathogenesis of AR and observed the influences of H-2 on cytokines IL-4 and IL-13. Methods: An AR guinea pig model was established by nasal ovatbumin sensitisation. Eighteen guinea pigs were divided into three groups, namely, saline control, AR-sensitised, and hydrogen rich saline (HRS)-treated groups, with each group having six guinea pigs. The frequencies of sneezing and scratching were recorded. The IgE level and cytokine (IL-4 and IL-13) levels in the serum were measured. The expression levels of IL-4 and IL-13 mRNA and protein in the nasal mucosa were also determined by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and Western blot. We also observed the infiltration of cytokine (IL-4 and IL-13) in nasal mucosa by immunofluorescence. Results: The frequencies of sneezing and scratching, as well as the levels of IgE, IL-4, and IL-13, in the serum were higher in the AR group than in the control group (p < 0.01), whereas all these parameters were decreased significantly after HRS treatment (p < 0.05). The expression levels of IL-4 and IL-13 mRNA and protein in the nasal mucosa were also lower in guinea pigs treated with HRS than those in the AR group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: HRS could affect anti-inflammation in AR and decreased the expression of IL-4 and IL-13. (C) 2016 SEICAP. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据