4.4 Article

Nonlinear buckling and postbuckling behavior of cylindrical shear deformable nanoshells subjected to radial compression including surface free energy effects

期刊

ACTA MECHANICA SOLIDA SINICA
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 209-222

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1016/j.camss.2017.02.002

关键词

Nanoscale structures; Size effect; Nonlinear buckling; Surface free energy; Boundary layer theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of the present investigation is to predict the nonlinear buckling and post-buckling characteristics of cylindrical shear deformable nanoshells with and without initial imperfection under hydrostatic pressure load in the presence of surface free energy effects. To this end, Gurtin-Murdoch elasticity theory is implemented into the first-order shear de-formation shell theory to develop a size-dependent shell model which has an excellent capability to take surface free energy effects into account. A linear variation through the shell thickness is assumed for the normal stress component of the bulk to satisfy the equilibrium conditions on the surfaces of nanoshell. On the basis of variational approach and using von Karman-Donnell-type of kinematic nonlinearity, the non-classical governing differential equations are derived. Then a boundary layer theory of shell buckling is employed incorporating the effects of surface free energy in conjunction with nonlinear prebuckling deformations, large deflections in the postbuckling domain and initial geometric imperfection. Finally, an efficient solution methodology based on a two-stepped singular perturbation technique is put into use in order to obtain the critical buckling loads and postbuckling equilibrium paths corresponding to various geometric parameters. It is demonstrated that the surface free energy effects cause increases in both the critical buckling pressure and critical end-shortening of a nanoshell made of silicon. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据