4.6 Article

Reaction of CO, H2O, H2 and CO2 on the clean as well as O, OH and H precovered Fe(100) and Fe(111) surfaces

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 427-440

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6cy02103d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21273262, 21273266, 21673268]
  2. Chinese Academy of Science and Synfuels CHINA. Co., Ltd
  3. BMBF
  4. state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adsorption and activation of CO, H2O, CO2 and H-2 on the clean as well as O, OH and H precovered Fe(100) surface at 0.25 ML coverage and Fe(111) surface at 0.33 ML coverage were computed on the basis of density functional theory (GGA-PBE) to investigate the catalytic activity of metallic iron. On the clean Fe(100) and Fe(111) surfaces, the most favorable reactions are H2O and CO dissociation, and the surface intermediates are the coadsorbed C + O + 2H; CO hydrogenation is kinetically favored and thermodynamically disfavored, whereas CO direct oxidation and COOH formation are kinetically much unfavorable. The O- and OH-precovered Fe(100) surfaces at 0.25 ML coverage and Fe(111) surfaces at 0.33 ML coverage do not promote CO2 formation from the CO direct oxidation and COOH formation from CO and OH coupling, whereas the 0.33 ML O-precovered Fe(111) surface suppresses CO dissociation. In contrast to the 0.25 ML H precovered Fe(110) surface, which does not show a significant effect in the surface reactions, the 0.33 ML H precovered Fe(111) surface can lower the barriers for CO oxidation and hydrogenation, whereas the barrier of COOH formation is increased. It was concluded that the metallic iron surfaces, in particular, the O and OH precovered iron surfaces are not appropriate catalysts for the water-gas shift reaction; however, CO2 dissociation is kinetically and thermodynamically much favorable on all these surfaces. For a given reaction on different surfaces, there is no linear Bronsted-Evans-Polanyi (BEP) correlation between the barriers and reaction energies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据