4.6 Article

Investigation of Fe2N@carbon encapsulated in N-doped graphene-like carbon as a catalyst in sustainable zinc-air batteries

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 23, 页码 5670-5676

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cy01721a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chongqing Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Technologies of Clean Energies
  2. Program for Excellent Talents in Chongqing [102060-20600218]
  3. Program for Innovation Team Building at Institutions of Higher Education in Chongqing [CXTDX201601011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rational construction of low cost, efficient, and stable oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) electrocatalysts is important for the commercialization of fuel cells and metal-air batteries. In this article, we report an easy and effective soft-template method to in situ assemble Fe2N nanoparticles on the surface of N-doped graphene-like carbon (NC). The prepared Fe2N nanoparticles were covered by a few carbon layers, which promoted the connection of Fe-N-X clusters with graphene to facilitate the formation of Fe-N-C active sites. Fe-N-X and NC units were found to respectively fulfill different functionalities, and commonly afford the sample with excellent performance. The electrochemical data show that the Fe2N@NC composite with high-purity and good crystalline displays a synergistic enhanced catalytic activity for ORR, including a positive onset potential (0.084 V), a half-wave potential (-0.036 V) and a high electron transfer number (similar to 4e(-)), as compared to 20% Pt/C. Additionally, the existence of carbon shells wrapped around Fe2N nanoparticles can restrain their expansion and dissolution. In addition, the as-prepared catalyst was implemented as an air catalyst for zinc-air batteries and was found to display a comparable open circuit voltage of ca. 1.48 V and a maximum power density of 82.3 mW cm(-2). These results demonstrate that the Fe2N@NC catalyst may serve as a good alternative to precious Pt for ORR in practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据