4.1 Article

High-throughput cell mechanical phenotyping for label-free titration assays of cytoskeletal modifications

期刊

CYTOSKELETON
卷 74, 期 8, 页码 283-296

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cm.21369

关键词

cell mechanics; cytoskeleton; label-free cell characterization; real-time deformability cytometry

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung
  2. Sachsische Ministerium fur Wissenschaft und Kunst [TG 70]
  3. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [03Z22CN11]
  4. State of Saxony
  5. European Fund for Regional Development - EFRE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanical fingerprint of cells is inherently linked to the structure of the cytoskeleton and can serve as a label-free marker for cell homeostasis or pathologic states. How cytoskeletal composition affects the physical response of cells to external loads has been intensively studied with a spectrum of techniques, yet quantitative and statistically powerful investigations in the form of titration assays are hampered by the low throughput of most available methods. In this study, we employ real-time deformability cytometry (RT-DC), a novel microfluidic tool to examine the effects of biochemically modified F-actin and microtubule stability and nuclear chromatin structure on cell deformation in a human leukemia cell line (HL60). The high throughput of our method facilitates extensive titration assays that allow for significance assessment of the observed effects and extraction of half-maximal concentrations for most of the applied reagents. We quantitatively show that integrity of the F-actin cortex and microtubule network dominate cell deformation on millisecond timescales probed with RT-DC. Drug-induced alterations in the nuclear chromatin structure were not found to consistently affect cell deformation. The sensitivity of the high-throughput cell mechanical measurements to the cytoskeletal modifications we present in this study opens up new possibilities for label-free dose-response assays of cytoskeletal modifications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据