4.8 Article

Wire and arc additive manufactured steel: Tensile and wear properties

期刊

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 115-123

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.010

关键词

3D printing; Steel; Wear; Strength; Focused ion beam; Microscopy

资金

  1. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Community and Economic Development [C000053981]
  2. Air Force Research Laboratory [FA8650-12-2-7230]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study systematically investigated the mechanical properties of wire-based (wire and arc additive manufacturing, known as WAAM) deposition of steel metals, both stainless steel 304 and mild steel ER7OS. Graded material properties of stainless steel 304 were observed for wear and hardness in the direction of deposition and in Z height, due to variations in local thermal histories of the metal. Wear rates decreased significantly (p = 5.6 x 10(-12) by one-way ANOVA) along the length of the deposited material, from K = 2.62 x 10(-5 )mm(3)/N m (+/- 2.32 x 10(-6) mm(3)/N m), to K= 0.63 mm3 x 10(-5) mm3/N m (+/-3.08 x 10-6 mm(3)/N m), whereas microhardness values increased significantly (p similar to 0 by one-way ANOVA) along the same path from mu = 202.3 HV and sigma = 5.82 HV to 210.9 HV and sigma = 5.91 HV. The yield and ultimate strength, however, were not found to be statistically significantly different (p = 0.55) along the direction of deposition for SS304. During wear testing, a grain refinement was observed directly beneath the wear scar in these materials in a focused ion beam channel observed under scanning electron microscopy. Additionally, no significant difference in yield strength was observed in printed mild steel (ER70S) between vertical and horizontal specimens. The observed graded mechanical properties in stainless steel 304 allow the opportunity for varying the processing conditions to design parts with locally optimized or functionally graded mechanical properties. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据