4.7 Article

The APC/C E3 Ligase Complex Activator FZR1 Restricts BRAF Oncogenic Function

期刊

CANCER DISCOVERY
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 424-441

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0647

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [GM089763, GM094777, CA177910, CA183914]
  2. Skin SPORE [1P50CA168536]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H05529, 16K15811] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BRAF drives tumorigenesis by coordinating the activation of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK oncogenic signaling cascade. However, upstream pathways governing BRAF kinase activity and protein stability remain undefi ned. Here, we report that in primary cells with active APC FZR1, APC FZR1 earmarks BRAF for ubiquitination-mediated proteolysis, whereas in cancer cells with APC-free FZR1, FZR1 suppresses BRAF through disrupting BRAF dimerization. Moreover, we identifi ed FZR1 as a direct target of ERK and CYCLIN D1/CDK4 kinases. Phosphorylation of FZR1 inhibits APC FZR1, leading to elevation of a cohort of oncogenic APC FZR1 substrates to facilitate melanomagenesis. Importantly, CDK4 and/or BRAF/MEK inhibitors restore APC FZR1 E3 ligase activity, which might be critical for their clinical effects. Furthermore, FZR1 depletion cooperates with AKT hyperactivation to transform primary melanocytes, whereas genetic ablation of Fzr1 synergizes with Pten loss, leading to aberrant coactivation of BRAF/ERK and AKT signaling in mice. Our fi ndings therefore reveal a reciprocal suppression mechanism between FZR1 and BRAF in controlling tumorigenesis. SIGNIFICANCE: FZR1 inhibits BRAF oncogenic functions via both APC-dependent proteolysis and APCindependent disruption of BRAF dimers, whereas hyperactivated ERK and CDK4 reciprocally suppress APC FZR1 E3 ligase activity. Aberrancies in this newly defi ned signaling network might account for BRAF hyperactivation in human cancers, suggesting that targeting CYCLIN D1/CDK4, alone or in combination with BRAF/MEK inhibition, can be an effective anti-melanoma therapy. (C) 2017 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据