4.1 Article Data Paper

Data on endogenous bovine ovarian follicular cells peptides and small proteins obtained through Top-down High Resolution Mass Spectrometry

期刊

DATA IN BRIEF
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 175-179

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.042

关键词

Top-down proteomics; Bovine; Ovary; Follicular cells

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  2. Val-de-Loire Region general Committee
  3. French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA)
  4. French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) under the SMHART [3069]
  5. INRA
  6. French National Research Agency [ANR-08-GENN-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The endogenous peptides and small proteins extracted from bovine ovarian follicular cells (oocytes, cumulus and granulosa cells) were identified by Top-down High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (TD-HR-MS/MS) in order to annotate peptido- and proteoforms detected using qualitative and quantitative profiling method based on ICM-MS (Intact Cell Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry). The description and analysis of these Top-down MS data in the context of oocyte quality biomarkers research are available in the original research article of Labas et al. (2017) http:Hcix.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2017.03.027 [1]. Raw data derived from this peptidomic/ proteomic analysis have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository (dataset identifier PXD004892). Here, we described the inventory of all identified peptido- and proteoforms including their biochemical and structural features, and functional annotation of correspondent proteins. This peptide/protein inventory revealed that TD-HR-MS/MS was appropriate method for both global and targeted proteomic analysis of ovarian tissues, and it can be further employed as a reference for other studies on follicular cells including single oocytes. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier lnc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据