4.6 Article

Activation of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons produces wakefulness through dopamine D2-like receptors in mice

期刊

BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION
卷 222, 期 6, 页码 2907-2915

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-017-1365-7

关键词

Chemogenetics; Sleep; DAT-Cre mice; Midbrain; Substantia nigra; D-1 receptors

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15K18359, 26220207/16K18358, 26640025, 2604762]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [16H01629]
  3. CREST grant from the Japan Science and Technology Agency
  4. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI) from MEXT
  5. Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology
  6. Naito Foundation, Japan
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K18358, 16H01629, 17H02215, 15K18359, 17H06047, 26220207, 26640025] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A growing body of evidence suggests that dopamine plays a role in sleep-wake regulation, but the dopamine-producing brain areas that control sleep-wake states are unclear. In this study, we chemogenetically activated dopamine neurons in the ventral midbrain of mice to examine the role of these neurons in sleep-wake regulation. We found that activation of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), but not in the substantia nigra, strongly induced wakefulness, although both cell populations expressed the neuronal activity marker c-Fos after chemogenetic stimulation. Analysis of the pattern of behavioral states revealed that VTA activation increased the duration of wakefulness and decreased the number of wakefulness episodes, indicating that wakefulness was consolidated by VTA activation. The increased wakefulness evoked by VTA activation was completely abolished by pretreatment with the dopamine D-2/D-3 receptor antagonist raclopride, but not by the D-1 receptor antagonist SCH23390. These findings indicate that the activation of VTA dopamine neurons promotes wakefulness via D-2/D-3 receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据