4.7 Article

Influences of dissolved oxygen concentration on biocathodic microbial communities in microbial fuel cells

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 116, 期 -, 页码 39-51

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.04.001

关键词

Biocathode; Illumina 16S rRNA sequencing; Spirulina; Electroactive biofilms; Oxygen reduction reaction ORR

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) [RBSI14JKU3]
  2. Research Fund for the Italian Electrical System
  3. Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) (BioFuelCellApp)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dissolved oxygen (DO) at cathodic interface is a critical factor influencing microbial fuel cells (MFC) performance. In this work, three MFCs were operated with cathode under different DO conditions: i) air-breathing (A-MFC); ii) water-submerged (W-MFC) and iii) assisted by photosynthetic microorganisms (P-MFC). A plateau of maximum current was reached at 1.06 +/- 0.03 mA, 1.48 +/- 0.06 mA and 1.66 +/- 0.04 mA, increasing respectively for W-MFC, P-MFC and A-MFC. Electrochemical and microbiological tools (Illumina sequencing, confocal microscopy and biofilm cryosectioning) were used to explore anodic and cathodic biofilm in each MFC type. In all cases, biocathodes improved oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) as compared to abiotic condition and A-MFC was the best performing system. Photosynthetic cultures in the cathodic chamber supplied high DO level, up to 16 mg(O2) L-1, which sustained aerobic microbial community in P-MFC biocathode. Halomonas, Pseudomonas and other microaerophilic genera reached > 50% of the total OTUs. The presence of sulfur reducing bacteria (Desulfuromonas) and purple non-sulfur bacteria in A-MFC biocathode suggested that the recirculation of sulfur compounds could shuttle electrons to sustain the reduction of oxygen as final electron acceptor. The low DO concentration limited the cathode in W-MFC A model of two different possible microbial mechanisms is proposed which can drive predominantly cathodic ORR. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据