4.3 Article

Social interaction, food, scent or toys? A formal assessment of domestic pet and shelter cat (Fells silvestris catus) preferences

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 322-328

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.03.016

关键词

Domestic cat; Fells sylvestris catus; Human-cat bond; Human interaction; Preference assessment

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [1314109-DGE]
  2. Oregon State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee policies (ACUP) [4767]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Domestic cats (Felts silvestris catus) engage in a variety of relationships with humans and can be conditioned to engage in numerous behaviors using Pavlovian and operant methods Increasingly cat cognition research is providing evidence of their complex socio-cognitive and problem solving abilities. Nonetheless, it is still common belief that cats are not especially sociable or trainable. This disconnect may be due, in part, to a lack of knowledge of what stimuli cats prefer, and thus may be most motivated to work for. The current study investigated domestic cat preferences at the individual and population level using a free operant preference assessment. Adult cats from two populations (pet and shelter) were presented with three stimuli within each of the following four categories: human social interaction, food, toy, and scent. Proportion of time interacting with each stimulus was recorded. The single most-preferred stimulus from each of the four categories were simultaneously presented in a final session to determine each cat's most-preferred stimulus overall. Although there was clear individual variability in cat preference, social interaction with humans was the most-preferred stimulus category for the majority of cats, followed by food. This was true for cats in both the pet and shelter population. Future research can examine the use of preferred stimuli as enrichment in applied settings arid assess individual cats' motivation to work for their most-preferred stimulus as a measure of reinforcer efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据