4.7 Article

Chemical synthesis of flower-like hybrid Cu(OH)2/CuO electrode: Application of polyvinyl alcohol and triton X-100 to enhance supercapacitor performance

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 165-174

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.05.018

关键词

Flowers-like nanostructures; Copper hydroxide/copper oxide; Polyvinyl alcohol; Triton x-100; Supercapacitor

资金

  1. Dongguk University-Seoul research fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research article, we report hybrid nanomaterials of copper hydroxide/copper oxide (Cu(OH)(2)/CuO). A thin films were prepared by using a facile and cost-effective successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) method. As-synthesized and hybrid Cu(OH)(2)/CuO with two different surfactants polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and triton-X 100 (TRX-100) was prepared having distinct morphological, structural, and supercapacitor properties. The surface of the thin film samples were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A nanoflower-like morphology of the Cu(OH)(2)/CuO nanostructures arranged vertically was evidenced on the stainless steel substrate. The surface was well covered by nanoflake-like morphology and formed a uniform Cu(OH)(2)/CuO nanostructures after treating with surfactants. X-ray diffraction patterns were used to confirm the hybrid phase of Cu(OH)(2)/CuO materials. The electrochemical properties of the pristine Cu(OH)(2)/CuO, PVA:Cu(OH)(2)/CuO,TRX-100:Cu(OH)(2)/CuO films were observed by cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge/discharge, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy technique. The electrochemical examination reveals that the Cu(OH)(2)/CuO electrode has excellent specific capacitance, 292, 533, and 443 Fg(-1) with pristine, PVA, and TRX-100, respectively in 1M Na2SO4 electrolyte solution. The cyclic voltammograms (CV) of Cu(OH)(2)/CuO electrode shows positive role of the PVA and TRX-100 to enhance supercapacitor performance. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据