4.5 Article

Frequent somatic mutations in epigenetic regulators in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia

期刊

BLOOD CANCER JOURNAL
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2017.36

关键词

-

资金

  1. Project for Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics (P-Direct)
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [15ck0106189h0001]
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  4. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund [26-A-24]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K09862, 16K09865, 17K09921, 15H05909, 26221308] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved the prognosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the ability of TKIs to eradicate CML remains uncertain and patients must continue TKI therapy for indefinite periods. In this study, we performed whole-exome sequencing to identify somatic mutations in 24 patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML who were registered in the JALSG CML212 study. We identified 191 somatic mutations other than the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene (median 8, range 1-17). Age, hemoglobin concentration and white blood cell counts were correlated with the number of mutations. Patients with mutations >= 6 showed higher rate of achieving major molecular response than thoseo6 (P = 0.0381). Mutations in epigenetic regulator, ASXL1, TET2, TET3, KDM1A and MSH6 were found in 25% of patients. TET2 or TET3, AKT1 and RUNX1 were mutated in one patient each. ASXL1 was mutated within exon 12 in three cases. Mutated genes were significantly enriched with cell signaling and cell division pathways. Furthermore, DNA copy number analysis showed that 2 of 24 patients had uniparental disomy of chromosome 1p or 3q, which disappeared major molecular response was achieved. These mutations may play significant roles in CML pathogenesis in addition to the strong driver mutation BCR-ABL1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据