4.6 Article

A New Model for Correlation and Prediction of Equilibrium CO2 Solubility in N-Methyl-4-Piperidinol Solvent

期刊

AICHE JOURNAL
卷 63, 期 8, 页码 3395-3403

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.15709

关键词

CO2 capture; tertiary amine; equilibrium solubility; novel thermodynamic model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21536003, 21606078, 21406057, 21476064, 21376067, 51521006]
  2. National Key Technology R&D Program (MOST) [2014BAC18B04]
  3. Innovative Research Team Development Plan (MOE) [IRT1238]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (MOE) [20130161110025]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province in China [2016JJ2015]
  6. China Outstanding Engineer Training Plan for Students of Chemical Engineering & Technology in Hunan University (MOE) [2011-40]
  7. NPRP Grant from the Qatar National Research Fund [7 - 1154 - 2 - 433]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the equilibrium CO2 solubility in the aqueous tertiary amine, N-methyl-4-piperidinol (MPDL) was measured over a range of temperatures, CO2 partial pressures and amine concentrations. The dissociation constant of the MPDL solution was determined as well. A new thermodynamic model was developed to predict the equilibrium CO2 solubility in the MPDL-H2O-CO2 system. This model, equipped with the correction factor (C-f), can give reasonable prediction with an average absolute deviation of 2.0%, and performs better than other models (i.e., KE model, Li-Shen model, and Hu-Chakma). The second-order reaction rate constant (k(2)) of MPDL and the heat of CO2 absorption (-Delta H-abs) into aqueous MPDL solutions were evaluated as well. Based on the comparison with some conventional amines, MPDL revealed a high-equilibrium CO2 loading, reasonably fast absorption rate when compared with other tertiary amines, and a low energy requirement for regeneration. It may, therefore, be considered to be an alternative solvent for CO2 capture. (C) 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据