4.6 Review

A critical reappraisal of bilateral adrenalectomy for ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 173, 期 4, 页码 M23-M32

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-15-0265

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [Re 752/22-1]
  2. European Science Foundation [5551]
  3. Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung
  4. Else Kroner-Fresenius Stiftung [2012_A103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Our aim was to review short-and long-term outcomes of patients treated with bilateral adrenalectomy (BADx) in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Methods: We reviewed the literature and analysed our experience with 53 patients treated with BADx since 1990 in our institution. Results: BADx is considered if ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome is refractory to other treatment modalities. In Cushing's disease (CD), BADx is mainly used as an ultima ratio after transsphenoidal surgery and medical therapies have failed. In these cases, the time span between the first diagnosis of CD and treatment with BADx is relatively long (median 44 months). In ectopic Cushing's syndrome, the time from diagnosis to BADx is shorter (median 2 months), and BADx is often performed as an emergency procedure because of life-threatening complications of severe hypercortisolism. In both situations, BADx is relatively safe (median surgical morbidity 15%; median surgical mortality 3%) and provides excellent control of hypercortisolism; Cushing's-associated signs and symptoms are rapidly corrected, and co-morbidities are stabilised. In CD, the quality of life following BADx is rapidly improving, and long-term mortality is low. Specific long-term complications include the development of adrenal crisis and Nelson's syndrome. In ectopic Cushing's syndrome, long-term mortality is high but is mostly dependent on the prognosis of the underlying malignant neuroendocrine tumour. Conclusion: BADx is a relatively safe and highly effective treatment, and it provides adequate control of long-term co-morbidities associated with hypercortisolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据