4.6 Article

Kinetics and equilibrium study for the adsorption of textile dyes on coconut shell activated carbon

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 S3381-S3393

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.01.020

关键词

Activated carbon; Adsorption; Isotherm; Kinetics; Thermodynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The preparation of activated carbon from coconut husk with H2SO4 activation ( CSAC) and its ability to remove textile dyes (maxilon blue GRL, and direct yellow DY 12), from aqueous solutions were reported in this study. The adsorbent was characterized with Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FT-IR), and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Various physiochemical parameters such as, contact time, initial dye concentration, adsorbent dosage, particle size, pH of dye solution and temperature were investigated in a batch-adsorption technique. Result showed that the adsorption of both GRL and DY 12 dyes was favorable at acidic pH. The adsorption uptake was found to increase with increase in initial dye concentration, and contact time but decreases with the amount of adsorbent, particle size, and temperature of the system. The chemisorption, intra-particle diffuse, pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models were applied to test the experimental data. The pseudo-second order exhibited the best fit for the kinetic studies, which indicates that adsorption of (GRL, and DY 12) is limited by chemisorption process. The equilibrium data were evaluated using Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Fritz-Schlunder isotherms. The Fritz-Schlunder model best describes the uptake of (GRL andDY12) dye, which implies that the adsorption of textiles dyes in this study onto coconut husk activated carbon is heterogeneous with multi-layers. Thermodynamic parameters such as Gibbs free energy, enthalpy and entropy were determined. It was found that (GRL and DY 12) dye adsorption was spontaneous and endothermic. (C) 2014 King Saud University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据