4.6 Article

Synthesis, physicochemical elucidation, biological screening and molecular docking studies of a Schiff base and its metal(II) complexes

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 1130-1141

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.09.015

关键词

Schiff base-metal complexes; Spectroscopy; X-ray analysis; DNA binding; Molecular docking

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan through CIIT Abbottabad [21-1209]
  2. Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Schiff base 1-((3-nitrophenylimino)methyl)naphthalen-2-olate (HL) and its two novel complexes with Zn(II) and Co(II) metals were successfully synthesized and characterized by FTIR, H-1 NMR, C-13 NMR, elemental analysis, magnetic susceptibility, TGA and EIS-MS. Crystal of Schiff base was also characterized by X-ray analysis and experimental parameters were found in line with the theoretical parameters. Quantum mechanical approach was also used to compare structural and calculated parameters and to ensure the geometry of metal complexes. The photometric behaviors of all the synthesized compounds were investigated in a wide pH range using BR buffers. Appearance of isosbestic point suggested the existence of Schiff base molecules in different tautomeric forms. Binding of synthesized complexes with calf thymus DNA was explored by photometric and voltammetric titrations and binding constants were calculated. The results indicated that ligand and its metal complexes bind to DNA by intercalation mode. Docking studies indicate their binding possibilities with topoisomerase II. Moreover, all these prepared compounds were screened for enzyme inhibition, antibacterial, cytotoxic and in vivo antidiabetic activities and found active against one or other activity. This effort just provides preliminary data for some biological properties and which can act as foundation stone for their application in drug development. (C) 2017 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据