4.6 Article

Prevalence and clinical features of the ectopic ACTH syndrome in patients with gastroenteropancreatic and thoracic neuroendocrine tumors

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 174, 期 3, 页码 271-280

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-15-0968

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Several series report on the relative contribution of ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS) in the spectrum of Cushing's syndrome. However, prevalence of EAS in patients with thoracic or gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) is currently unknown. Design: We assessed, in a tertiary referral center, the prevalence of EAS in a large cohort of thoracic and GEP-NET patients including clinical, biochemical, and radiological features; management; and treatment outcome. Methods: In total, 918 patients with thoracic or GEP-NETs were studied (1993-2012). Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and small cell lung carcinoma patients were excluded. Differentiation between synchronous, metachronous, and cyclic occurrence of EAS was made. Results: Out of the 918 patients with thoracic and GEP-NETs (469 males and 449 females; median age 58.7 years (range: 17.3-87.3)), 29 patients (3.2%) had EAS (ten males and 19 females; median age 48.1 years (range: 24.7-77.9)). EAS occurred synchronously in 23 patients (79%), metachronously in four patients (14%), and cyclical in two patients (7%) respectively. NETs causing EAS included lung/bronchus (n=9), pancreatic (n=9), and thymic (n=4). In four patients, the cause of EAS was unknown (n=4). Median overall survival (OS) of non-EAS thoracic and GEP-NET patients was 61.2 months (range: 0.6-249.4). Median OS of EAS patients was 41.4 months (range: 2.2-250.9). After comparison, only the first 5-year survival was significantly shorter (P=0.013) in EAS patients. Conclusion: Prevalence of EAS in this large cohort of patients with thoracic and GEP-NETs was 3.2%. EAS was mostly caused by thoracic and pancreatic NETs. First 5-year survival of EAS patients was shorter compared with non-EAS patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据