4.7 Article

Magnetic nanoparticles-carbon nanotubes hybrid composites for selective solid-phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and determination by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 409, 期 21, 页码 5125-5132

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0459-7

关键词

Hybrid composites; Magnetic solid phase extraction; Carbon nanotubes; Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Water samples

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Spain) [CTQ2016-78793-P]
  2. Junta de Comunidades de Castilla - La Mancha (Spain) [PEIC-2014-001-P]
  3. INCRECYT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A rapid and reliable method based on magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC-FLD) analysis was developed and validated for the quantitative determination of seven polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water samples. Hybrid composites made up of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were tested as adsorbent materials. The main factors influencing the extraction yields were optimized, namely the amount and type of adsorbent in the adsorption, and the solvent, the type of energy and the time in the desorption step. The selected composite was made up of Fe3O4 and multiwalled (MW)-CNTs. The desorption was carried out with sonication probe and tetrahydrofuran (THF); this solvent makes the method directly compatible with the chromatographic mobile phase and it reduces the analysis time. Under the optimized conditions, the LODs and LOQs achieved were in the range of 0.025-0.73 and 0.04-2.4 ng mL(-1), respectively. The calibration curves were linear (R-2 >= 0.9936) over the concentration ranges from 1 to 500 ng mL(-1). The recoveries of PAHs were from 76.4 +/- 1.7 up to 106.5 +/- 3.5%. The method was applied to synthetic and real (tap, dam, river and mineral) water samples with different characteristics to evaluate the performance under real conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据