4.7 Article

The Splashback Radius of Halos from Particle Dynamics. II. Dependence on Mass, Accretion Rate, Redshift, and Cosmology

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 843, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa79ab

关键词

cosmology: theory; dark matter; methods: numerical

资金

  1. Institute for Theory and Computation Fellowship
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Physics [1125897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H01089] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The splashback radius R-sp, the apocentric radius of particles on their first orbit after falling into a dark matter halo, has recently been suggested to be a physically motivated halo boundary that separates accreting from orbiting material. Using the SPARTA code presented in Paper I, we analyze the orbits of billions of particles in cosmological simulations of structure formation and measure R-sp for a large sample of halos that span a mass range from dwarf galaxy to massive cluster halos, reach redshift 8, and include WMAP, Planck, and self-similar cosmologies. We analyze the dependence of R-sp/R-200m and M-sp/M-200m on the mass accretion rate Gamma, halo mass, redshift, and cosmology. The scatter in these relations varies between 0.02 and 0.1 dex. While we confirm the known trend that Rsp/R200m decreases with G, the relationships turn out to be more complex than previously thought, demonstrating that Rsp is an independent definition of the halo boundary that cannot trivially be reconstructed from spherical overdensity definitions. We present fitting functions for R-sp/R-200m and M-sp/M-200m as a function of accretion rate, peak height, and redshift, achieving an accuracy of 5% or better everywhere in the parameter space explored. We discuss the physical meaning of the distribution of particle apocenters and show that the previously proposed definition of R-sp as the radius of the steepest logarithmic density slope encloses roughly three-quarters of the apocenters. Finally, we conclude that no analytical model presented thus far can fully explain our results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据