4.5 Article

BMP15 knockout-like effect in familial premature ovarian insufficiency with persistent ovarian reserve

期刊

CLINICAL GENETICS
卷 92, 期 2, 页码 208-212

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cge.12970

关键词

BMP15; deletion; fertility preservation; gene; haploinsufficiency; knockout; male; mutation; premature ovarian insufficiency

资金

  1. Univ Paris Sud
  2. Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP)
  3. Delegation de la Recherche Clinique (DRC) [PHRC AOM08084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) affects 1% to 2% of women under 40 years. Bone morphogenetic protein 15 (BMP15) variants have been described in POI. We studied a family with 2 sisters compound heterozygous for deletions in the BMP15 gene on chromosome Xp11.22 yielding a human knockout-like effect: a c. 151_152delGA deletion yielded a p.Glu51IlefsTer27 mutation transmitted by the hemizygous father and a c. 189_198delAGGGCATTCAinsTG deletion/insertion yielded a p.Glu64AlafsTer12 mutation transmitted by the heterozygous mother. Both deletions resulted in frameshifts with premature stop codons at positions 78 and 76 in the proregion, precluding mature BMP15 production. One sister had primary amenorrhea and the other primo-secondary amenorrhea. No bone abnormality was observed. Despite streak ovaries devoid of follicles on ultrasonography, anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels were low but detectable suggesting the presence of growing follicles. Five years later, AMH was undetectable in both sisters, 1 had received an egg donation. BMP15 did not seem critical for follicles to enter the growth phase. Genetic counselling should be performed and fertility preservation discussed before progressive loss of follicular reserve. The fertile heterozygous mother did not support previous reports of BMP15 haploinsufficiency and gene dosage in humans, as in bovine species. The hemizygous brother had asthenozoospermia, consistent with previous observations in bulls with a variant BMP15.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据