4.8 Article

Cesium Doped NiOx as an Efficient Hole Extraction Layer for Inverted Planar Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201700722

关键词

cesium doping; nickel oxide; organometallic halide perovskite; solar cells

资金

  1. Strategic Research Theme of the University of Hong Kong
  2. University Development Fund of the University of Hong Kong
  3. Seed Fund for Basic Research of the University of Hong Kong
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen Innovation Committee [JCYJ20150529152146471]
  5. Shenzhen Key Laboratory Project [ZDSYS201602261933302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cells have resulted in tremendous interest in developing next generation photovoltaics due to high record efficiency exceeding 22%. For inverted structure perovskite solar cells, the hole extraction layers play a significant role in achieving efficient and stable perovskite solar cell by modifying charge extraction, interfacial recombination losses, and band alignment. Here, cesium doped NiOx is selected as a hole extraction layer to study the impact of Cs dopant on the optoelectronic properties of NiOx and the photovoltaic performance. Cs doped NiOx films are prepared by a simple solution-based method. Both doped and undoped NiOx films are smooth and highly transparent, while the Cs doped NiOx exhibits better electron conductivity and higher work function. Therefore, Cs doping results in a significant improvement in the performance of NiOx-based inverted planar perovskite solar cells. The best efficiency of Cs doped NiOx devices is 19.35%, and those devices show high stability as well. The improved efficiency in devices with Cs:NiOx is attributed to a significant improvement in the hole extraction and better band alignment compared to undoped NiOx. This work reveals that Cs doped NiOx is very promising hole extraction material for high and stable inverted perovskite solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据