4.8 Article

Tungsten Disulfide Catalysts Supported on a Carbon Cloth Interlayer for High Performance Li-S Battery

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201602567

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hyundai Research Foundation [UTA15-000746]
  2. Institute for Basic Science [IBS-R006-G1]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2015R1D1A1A01056874, NRF-2015R1A2A1A05001737]
  4. Energy Efficiency & Resources Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  5. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20152020104870]
  6. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20152020104870] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  7. Ministry of Science & ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea [IBS-R006-D1-2017-A00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  8. National Research Foundation of Korea [10Z20130011056] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The capacity limitations of insertion-compound cathodes has motivated interest in a sulfur cathode for a rechargeable battery cell with a metallic-lithium anode; but irreversible capacity loss owing to solubility of intermediate Li2Sx (x = 2-8) polysulfides in the organic-liquid electrolytes used has prevented practical application. A dual-function cathode structure consisting of layered tungsten disulfide (WS2) supported both on the cathode current collector and on a carbon cloth interlayer (CCl) gives excellent performance in a lithium half-cell by providing strong adsorption of the soluble Li2Sx on the WS2 with fast access to electrons from the current collector via a blocking carbon cloth interlayer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据