4.8 Article

High-Performance All-Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Enabled by Amorphous Sulfur-Coated Reduced Graphene Oxide Cathodes

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201602923

关键词

lithium-sulfur batteries; cycling stability; reduced graphene oxide; sulfide electrolyte; amorphous sulfur

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA09010201]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51502317]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2017342]
  4. Army Research Office [W911NF1510187]
  5. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [W911NF1510187] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Safety and the polysulfide shuttle reaction are two major challenges for liquid electrolyte lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. Although use of solid-state electrolytes can overcome these two challenges, it also brings new challenges by increasing the interface resistance and stress/strain. In this work, the interface resistance and stress/strain of sulfur cathodes are significantly reduced by conformal coating approximate to 2 nm sulfur (S) onto reduced graphene oxide (rGO). An Li-S full cell consisting of an rGO@S-Li10GeP2S12-acetylene black (AB) composite cathode is evaluated. At 60 degrees C, the all-solid-state Li-S cell demonstrates a similar electrochemical performance as in liquid organic electrolyte, with high rate capacities of 1525.6, 1384.5, 1336.3, 903.2, 502.6, and 204.7 mA h g(-1) at 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 C, respectively. It can maintain a high and reversible capacity of 830 mA h g(-1) at 1.0 C for 750 cycles. The uniform distribution of the rGO@ S nanocomposite in the Li10GeP2S12-AB matrix generates uniform volume changes during lithiation/delithiation, significantly reducing the stress/strain, thus extending the cycle life. Minimization of the stress/strain of solid cells is the key for a long cycle life of all-solid-state Li-S batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据