4.8 Article

Systematic Study of Effect on Enhancing Specific Capacity and Electrochemical Behaviors of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201701330

关键词

carbon matrix; effect; Li-S batteries; N-doped; surface area

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [21371108, 21601108, 51672114]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2016JC033, 2016GN010]
  3. Marine Equipment and Technology Institute of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, a flexible method is designed to engineer nitrogen-doped carbon materials (NC) with different functional and structural specialties involving N-doping level, graphitization, and surface area via tuning the carbonization temperature of the pre-prepared zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8 ) crystals. With the aim to unveil the effect of these features on the electrochemical performance of sulfur cathode, these samples are evaluated as sulfur host and comprehensively investigated. NC-800 (800 degrees C, 10.45%N, 1032.4 m(2) g(-1)) exhibits the best electrochemical capability comparing with NC-700 (700 degrees C, 16.59%N, 891.4 m(2) g(-1)) and NC-900 (900 degrees C, 7.59%N, 987.6 m(2) g(-1)). High surface area and N-doping can work together to well increase the capacity of sulfur cathode, thanks to the improved transportation of charge carriers and effective anchoring of active sulfur, while the latter specialty just makes sulfur cathode have decent capacity in case of low surface area. Graphitization and quaternary nitrogen favorably improve the electric conductivity of the electrode, empowering the improvement of discharge capacity initially and rendering the good cyclability cooperatively relying on the effective immobilization of active materials. The related results suggest the significance of rational design of carbon maxtrix for sulfur to improve the performance of Li-S batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据