4.8 Review

Hierarchical Nanostructures: Design for Sustainable Water Splitting

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201700559

关键词

electrocatalysts; hierarchical nanostructures; solar fuels; water splitting

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672229]
  2. Environment and Conservation Fund [ECF 2016-85]
  3. General Research Fund of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong SAR, China [CityU 11213115]
  4. Science Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20160229165240684]
  5. Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clean and sustainable hydrogen generation renders a magnificent prospect to fulfill the humans' dream of rebuilding energy supplying systems that work eternally and run without pollution. Water electrolysis driven by a renewable resource of energy, such as wind and solar, is a promising pathway to achieve this goal, which requires highly active and cost-effective electrode materials to be developed. In this comprehensive review, we introduce the utilization of hierarchical nanostructures in electrocatalytic and photoelectrochemical applications. The unique emphasis is given on the synthetic strategies of attaining these hierarchical structures as well as to demonstrate their corresponding mechanisms for performance improvement. Rather than simply discussing all the methods that can be used in nanofabrication, we focus on extracting the rules for structural design based on highly accessible and reliable methods. Examples are given to illustrate the versatility of these methods in the synthesis and manipulation of hierarchical nanostructures, which are concentrated on nonprecious transition metals or their alloys/compounds. Through this study, we aim to establish valuable guidelines and provide further insights for researchers to facilitate their design of more efficient water splitting systems in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据