4.8 Article

Hydrothermal Synthesis of Monolithic Co3Se4 Nanowire Electrodes for Oxygen Evolution and Overall Water Splitting with High Efficiency and Extraordinary Catalytic Stability

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201602579

关键词

bifunctional catalysts; Co3Se4 nanowires; electrocatalysis; overall water splitting; oxygen evolution reaction

资金

  1. FCT [IF/01595/2014]
  2. Portuguese Foundation of Science & Technology (FCT) [IF/01595/2014/CP1247/ CT0001]
  3. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Action COFUND programme (NanoTrainforGrowth) [600375]
  4. European Commission [686053]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [IF/01595/2014/CP1247/CT0001] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cobalt selenide has been proposed to be an effective low-cost electrocatalyst toward the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) due to its well-suited electronic configuration. However, pure cobalt selenide has by far still exhibited catalytic activity far below what is expected. Herein, this paper for the first time reports the synthesis of new monoclinic Co3Se4 thin nanowires on cobalt foam (CF) via a facile one-pot hydrothermal process using selenourea. When used to catalyze the OER in basic solution, the conditioned monolithic self-supported Co3Se4/CF electrode shows an exceptionally high catalytic current of 397 mA cm(-2) at a low overpotential (eta) of 320 mV, a small Tafel slope of 44 mV dec(-1), a turnover frequency of 6.44 x 10(-2) s(-1) at eta = 320 mV, and excellent electrocatalytic stability at various current densities. Furthermore, an electrolyzer is assembled using two symmetrical Co3Se4/CF electrodes as anode and cathode, which can deliver 10 and 20 mA cm(-2) at low cell voltages of 1.59 and 1.63 V, respectively. More significantly, the electrolyzer can operate at 10 mA cm(-2) over 3500 h and at 100 mA cm(-2) for at least 2000 h without noticeable degradation, showing extraordinary operational stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据