4.6 Article

Factors predictive of leg-ulcer healing in sickle cell disease: a multicentre, prospective cohort study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 177, 期 1, 页码 206-211

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15241

关键词

-

资金

  1. AFM-Telethon Centre d'Etude des Cellules Souches (CECS/AFM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Leg ulcers (LUs) are a chronic and severe complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). A prospective study in patients with SCD to identify factors associated with complete healing and recurrence of LUs is lacking. Objectives To determine clinical and biological factors associated with SCD-LU complete healing and recurrence. Methods This prospective, observational cohort study was conducted at two adult SCD referral-centre sites (2009-2015) and included 98 consecutive patients with at least one LU lasting >= 2 weeks. The primary end points compared patients with healed vs. nonhealed LUs at week 24, and patients with vs. without recurrence during follow-up. Results The median (interquartile range) LU area, duration and follow-up were, respectively, 6.2 cm(2) (3-12.8), 9 weeks (4-26) and 65.8 weeks (23.8-122.1). At week 24, LUs were healed in 47% of patients, while 49% of LUs recurred. Univariate analyses identified inclusion LU area < 8 cm(2) (82% vs. 35%; P < 0.001), inclusion LU duration < 9 weeks (65% vs. 35%; P = 0.0013) and high median fetal haemoglobin level (P = 0.008) as being significantly associated with complete healing at week 24, and low lactate dehydrogenase level (P = 0.038) as being associated with recurrence. Multivariate analyses retained LU area < 8 cm 2 (odds ratio 6.73, 95% confidence interval 2.35-19.31; P < 0.001) and < 9 weeks' duration (OR 3.19, 95% confidence interval 1.16-8.76; P = 0.024) as being independently associated with healing at week 24. Factors independently associated with recurrence could not be identified. Conclusions SCD-LU complete healing is independently associated with the clinical characteristics of LUs rather than the clinical or biological characteristics of SCD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据