4.8 Article

MoS2/Graphene Nanosheets from Commercial Bulky MoS2 and Graphite as Anode Materials for High Rate Sodium-Ion Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201702383

关键词

ball-milling exfoliation; defects; MoS2; Graphene; rate performance; sodium ion batteries

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21671200, 21571189]
  2. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project, China [2016TP1007]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University
  4. Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC)
  5. High Performance Computing Center of CSU, China
  6. Australian Research Council through its Discovery and Linkage Programs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tuning heterointerfaces between hybrid phases is a very promising strategy for designing advanced energy storage materials. Herein, a low-cost, high-yield, and scalable two-step approach is reported to prepare a new type of hybrid material containing MoS2/graphene nanosheets prepared from ball-milling and exfoliation of commercial bulky MoS2 and graphite. When tested as an anode material for a sodium-ion battery, the as-prepared MoS2/graphene nanosheets exhibit remarkably high rate capability (284 mA h g(-1) at 20 A g(-1) (approximate to 30C) and 201 mA h g(-1) at 50 A g(-1) (approximate to 75C)) and excellent cycling stability (capacity retention of 95% after 250 cycles at 0.3 A g(-1)). Detailed experimental measurements and density functional theory calculation reveal that the functional groups in 2D MoS2/graphene heterostructures can be well tuned. The impressive rate capacity of the as-prepared MoS2/graphene hybrids should be attributed to the heterostructures with a low degree of defects and residual oxygen containing groups in graphene, which subsequently improve the electronic conductivity of graphene and decrease the Na+ diffusion barrier at the MoS2/graphene interfaces in comparison with the acid treated one.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据