4.7 Article

Anthropogenic protection alters the microbiome in intertidal mangrove wetlands in Hainan Island

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 101, 期 15, 页码 6241-6252

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-017-8342-1

关键词

Hainan Island; Mangrove wetland; Microbiome; Functional group; Environmental variable

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31500447, 41401075]
  2. Open Project of Key Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences [kf2016007]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences B [XDB15040102]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20140923]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intertidal mangrove wetlands are of great economic and ecological importance. The regular influence of tides has led to the microbial communities in these wetlands differing significantly from those in other habitats. In this study, we investigated the microbiomes of the two largest mangrove wetlands in Hainan Island, China, which have different levels of anthropogenic protection. Soil samples were collected from the root zone of 13 mangrove species. The microbial composition, including key functional groups, was assessed using Illumina sequencing. Bioinformatics analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the microbiomes between the protected Bamen Bay and the unprotected Dongzhai Bay. The overall microbiome was assigned into 78 phyla and Proteobacteria was the most abundant phylum at both sites. In the protected wetland, there were fewer marine-related microbial communities, such as sulfate-reducing bacteria, and more terrestrial-related communities, such as Verrucomicrobia methanotrophs. We also observed distinct microbial compositions among the different mangrove species at the protected site. Our data suggest that the different microbiomes of the two mangrove wetlands are the result of a complex interaction of the different environmental variables at the two sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据