4.8 Article

A Density Functional plus U Assessment of Oxygen Evolution Reaction Mechanisms on β-NiOOH

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 5329-5339

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b00999

关键词

oxygen evolution reaction; nickel oxyhydroxide; density functional theory; transition metal oxides; electrocatalysis

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-14-1-0254]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NiOx has long been studied both as a battery cathode material and electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Numerous investigations have demonstrated that Fe-doped nickel oxyhydroxide (NiOOH) is one of the most active OER catalysts in alkaline media. Despite extensive research, however, many unanswered questions pertaining to the OER mechanism on this material remain. Here, using density functional theory + U calculations, we compare several surfaces of beta-NiOOH studied for the OER and determine that unlike some earlier models selected, the (001) surface is the most stable surface under electrochemical conditions. We then examine several magnetic states of this material and predict that, unlike bulk beta-NiOOH, (001)-beta-NiOOH manifests a slight preference to be ferromagnetic. We then use the resulting structural model to compare in detail four commonly proposed OER mechanisms. In addition to excluding a proposed mechanism involving hydrogen peroxide formation, we identify multiple binuclear mechanisms with slightly lower overpotentials than the commonly studied associative mechanism. All exhibit overpotentials that coincide well with measured values. However, the similarity in calculated overpotentials highlights the fact that several mechanisms are likely to be operative under electrochemical conditions on beta-NiOOH. This finding suggests that much of the complexity of studying the OER on NiOOH is due to multiple competing mechanisms occurring under given conditions, which should be accounted for in subsequent analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据