4.8 Article

Ethylene Dehydrogenation on Pt4,7,8 Clusters on Al2O3: Strong Cluster Size Dependence Linked to Preferred Catalyst Morphologies

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 3322-3335

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b00409

关键词

cluster catalysis; cluster fluxionality; dehydrogenation; selectivity; theory; experiment

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research under a Basic Research Initiative [AFOSR FA9550-16-1-0141]
  2. UCLA Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Dissertation Year Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalytic dehydrogenation of ethylene on size-selected Pt-n (n = 4, 7, 8) clusters deposited on the surface of Al2O3 was studied experimentally and theoretically. Clusters were mass-selected, deposited on the alumina support, and probed by a combination of low energy ion scattering, temperature-programmed desorption and reaction of C2D4 and D-2, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, density functional theory, and statistical mechanical theory. Pt-7 is identified as the most catalytically active cluster, while Pt-4 and Pt-8 exhibit comparable activities. The higher activity can be related to the cluster structure and particularly to the distribution of cluster morphologies accessible at the temperatures and coverage with ethylene in catalytic conditions. Specifically, while Pt-7 and Pt-8 on alumina have very similar prismatic global minimum geometries, Pt-7 at higher temperatures also has access to single-layer isomers, which become more and more predominant in the cluster catalyst ensemble upon increasing ethylene coverage. Single-layer isomers feature greater charge transfer from the support and more binding sites that activate ethylene dehydrogenation rather than hydrogenation or desorption. Size-dependent susceptibility to coking and deactivation was also investigated. Our results show that size-dependent catalytic activity of clusters is not a simple property of single cluster geometry but the average over a statistical ensemble at relevant conditions. for

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据