4.8 Article

Effects of Sodium on the Catalytic Performance of CoMn Catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch to Olefin Reactions

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 3622-3631

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03478

关键词

Fischer-Tropsch to olefins; cobalt carbide; lower olefins; syngas; nanocatalysis; sodium

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21403278, 21573271, 91545112]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission, China [15DZ1170500, 16DZ1206900]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFA0202802]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-SLH035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of a sodium (Na) promoter on the catalytic performance of cobalt-manganese (CoMn) catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch to (FTO) For olefin reactions were investigated. the the sample without Na, Co-0 was found to be the active phase for the traditional Co-based Fischer-Tropsch reaction with low CO2 selectivity. The olefin/paraffin (O/P) ratio was found to be low with a C-2-4(=) selectivity of only 15.4 C%. However, with the addition of Na, cobalt carbide (Co2C) quadrangular nanoprisms with the (101) and (020) facets exposed were formed. The Co2C nanoprisms displayed a high C-2-4(=) selectivity (54.2 C%) as well as a low methane selectivity (5.9 C%) under mild reaction conditions. The O/P ratio for C2-4 reached 23.9, and the product distribution deviated greatly from the classical Anderson-Schulz-Flory (ASF) distribution. Co2C nanoprisms were considered to be an effective FTO active phase with strong facet effects. The Na promoter played a key role in the evolution of the FTO catalysts. The addition of Na, which acted as an electronic donor to cobalt, resulted in stronger CO adsorption and enhanced CO dissociation, which also benefited the formation of the Co2C phase, leading to highly stable and active catalysts. The effects of other alkali promoters were also studied, and only the K promoter had an effect similar to that of Na on the CoMn catalysts for promoting the FTO reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据