4.8 Article

Defective and c-Disordered Hortensia-like Layered MnOx as an Efficient Electrocatalyst for Water Oxidation at Neutral pH

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 6311-6322

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b00420

关键词

artificial photosynthesis; electrocatalyst; layered manganese oxide; oxygen evolution; solar fuel; water oxidation

资金

  1. Swedish Energy Agency
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21120102036, 91233201]
  5. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2014CB239402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of a highly active manganese-based water oxidation catalyst in the design of an ideal artificial photosynthetic device operating under neutral pH conditions remains a great challenge, due to the instability of pivotal Mn3+ intermediates. We report here defective and c-disordered layered manganese oxides (MnOx-300) formed on a fluorine-doped tin oxide electrode by constant anodic potential deposition and subsequent annealing, with a catalytic onset (0.25 mA/cm(2)) at an overpotential (eta) of 280 mV and a benchmark catalytic current density of 1.0 mA/cm(2) at an overpotential (eta) of 330 mV under neutral pH (1 M potassium phosphate). Steady current density above 8.2 mA/cm(2) was obtained during the electrolysis at 1.4 V versus the normal hydrogen electrode for 20 h. Insightful studies showed that the main contributing factors for the observed high activity of MnOx-300 are (i) a defective and randomly stacked layered structure, (ii) an increased degree of Jahn-Teller distorted Mn3+ in the MnO6 octahedral sheets, (iii) effective stabilization of Mn3+, (iv) a high surface area, and (v) improved electrical conductivity. These results demonstrate that manganese oxides as structural and functional models of an oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) in photosystem II are promising catalysts for water oxidation in addition to Ni/Co-based oxides/hydroxides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据