4.8 Article

A Versatile Disulfide-Driven Recycling System for NADP+ with High Cofactor Turnover Number

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 1025-1029

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03061

关键词

biocatalysis; biosynthesis; cofactor/coenzyme recycling; enzyme oxidation; biotechnology

资金

  1. Cardiff University
  2. UK's Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/J005266/1, BB/L020394/1]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J005266/1, BB/L020394/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/L020394/1, BB/J005266/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NADP(+)-dependent enzymes are important in many biocatalytic processes to generate high-value chemicals for the pharmaceutical and food industry; hence, a cost-effective, efficient, and environmentally friendly recycling system for the relatively expensive and only marginally stable enzyme cofactor NADP(+) offers significant benefits. NADP(+) regeneration schemes have previously been described, but their application is severely limited by the low total turnover numbers (TTN) for the cofactor. Here, we report a glutathione-based recycling system that combines glutaredoxin from E. coli (EcGRX) and the glutathione reductase from S. cerevisiae (ScGR) for NADP(+) regeneration. This system employs inexpensive latent organic disulfides such as oxidized cysteine or 2-hydroxyethyl disulfide (HED) as oxidizing agents and allows NADP(+) recycling under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions with a TTN in excess of 5 x 10(5), indicating that each regeneration cycle is 99.9998% selective toward forming the cofactor. Accordingly, for each 1 mol of product generated, less than $0.05 of cofactor is needed. Finally, the EcGRX/ScGR pair is compatible with eight enzymes in the guanosine monophosphate (GMP) biosynthetic pathway, giving the corresponding isotopically labeled nucleotide in high yield. The glutathione-based NADP(+) recycling system has potential for biocatalytic applications in academic and industrial settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据