4.8 Article

Probing ultrafast ππ*/nπ* internal conversion in organic chromophores via K-edge resonant absorption

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00069-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. AMOS program within the Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division of the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy
  2. NOTUR [nn2962k]
  3. Office of Science Early Career Research Program through the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  4. NB [DE-SC0012376]
  5. Lichtenberg Professorship from the Volkswagen foundation
  6. German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina [LPDS2013-14]
  7. FP7-PEOPLE-IOF [625321]
  8. European Research Agency [298210]
  9. AIAS-COFUND program [609033]
  10. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden
  11. Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many photoinduced processes including photosynthesis and human vision happen in organic molecules and involve coupled femtosecond dynamics of nuclei and electrons. Organic molecules with heteroatoms often possess an important excited-state relaxation channel from an optically allowed pi pi* to a dark n pi* state. The pi pi*/n pi* internal conversion is difficult to investigate, as most spectroscopic methods are not exclusively sensitive to changes in the excited-state electronic structure. Here, we report achieving the required sensitivity by exploiting the element and site specificity of near-edge soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy. As a hole forms in the n orbital during pi pi*/n pi* internal conversion, the absorption spectrum at the heteroatom K-edge exhibits an additional resonance. We demonstrate the concept using the nucleobase thymine at the oxygen K-edge, and unambiguously show that pi pi*/n pi* internal conversion takes place within (60 +/- 30) fs. High-level-coupled cluster calculations confirm the method's impressive electronic structure sensitivity for excited-state investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据