4.7 Article

The Galaxy Count Correlation Function in Redshift Space Revisited

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 845, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7cf8

关键词

cosmology: theory; large-scale structure of universe; methods: numerical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the near future, cosmology will enter the wide and deep galaxy survey era, enabling high-precision studies of the large-scale structure of the universe in three dimensions. To test cosmological models and determine their parameters accurately, it is necessary to use data with exact theoretical expectations expressed in observational parameter space (angles and redshift). The data-driven, galaxy number count fluctuations on redshift shells can be used to build correlation functions xi(theta, z(1), z(2)) on and between shells to probe the baryonic acoustic oscillations and distance-redshift distortions, as well as gravitational lensing and other relativistic effects. To obtain a numerical estimation of xi(theta, z(1), z(2)) from a cosmological model, it is typical to use either a closed form derived from a tripolar spherical expansion or to compute the power spectrum C-l (z1, z2) and perform a Legendre polynomial P-l(cos theta) expansion. Here, we present a new derivation of a xi(theta, z1, z2) closed form using the spherical harmonic expansion and proceeding to an infinite sum over multipoles thanks to an addition theorem. We demonstrate that this new expression is perfectly compatible with the existing closed forms but is simpler to establish and manipulate. We provide formulas for the leading density and redshift-space contributions, but also show how Doppler-like and lensing terms can be easily included in this formalism. We have implemented and made publicly available software for computing those correlations efficiently, without any Limber approximation, and validated this software with the CLASSgal code. It is available at https://gitlab.in2p3.fr/ campagne/AngPow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据