4.8 Article

Mechanistic understanding of in vivo protein corona formation on polymeric nanoparticles and impact on pharmacokinetics

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00600-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [U54-CA151884]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Program of Excellence in Nanotechnology (PEN) [HHSN268201000045C]
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) R01 grant [EB015419-01]
  4. David Koch-Prostate Cancer Foundation Award in Nanotherapeutics
  5. Koch Institute Support from the NCI [P30-CA14051]
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  7. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  8. MIT-Brazil Cooperation Program from CNPq [202996/2014-0]
  9. Wellcome Trust-MIT postdoctoral fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vitro incubation of nanomaterials with plasma offer insights on biological interactions, but cannot fully explain the in vivo fate of nanomaterials. Here, we use a library of polymer nanoparticles to show how physicochemical characteristics influence blood circulation and early distribution. For particles with different diameters, surface hydrophilicity appears to mediate early clearance. Densities above a critical value of approximately 20 poly(ethylene glycol) chains (MW 5 kDa) per 100 nm(2) prolong circulation times, irrespective of size. In knockout mice, clearance mechanisms are identified for nanoparticles with low and high steric protection. Studies in animals deficient in the C3 protein showed that complement activation could not explain differences in the clearance of nanoparticles. In nanoparticles with low poly(ethylene glycol) coverage, adsorption of apolipoproteins can prolong circulation times. In parallel, the low-density-lipoprotein receptor plays a predominant role in the clearance of nanoparticles, irrespective of poly(ethylene glycol) density. These results further our understanding of nanopharmacology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据