4.8 Article

Functional characterization of a multi-cancer risk locus on chr5p15.33 reveals regulation of TERT by ZNF148

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15034

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute [HHSN261200800001E]
  2. Cancer Research UK for SEARCH [C490/A10124]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO Gravitation Program Cancer Genomics Netherlands)
  4. Marie Curie Initial Training Network (ITN) DevCom [607142]
  5. MRC [MR/N003284/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Cancer Research UK [10589, 14136, 19167] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0401527, G1000143, MR/N003284/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10114] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome wide association studies (GWAS) have mapped multiple independent cancer susceptibility loci to chr5p15.33. Here, we show that fine-mapping of pancreatic and testicular cancer GWAS within one of these loci (Region 2 in CLPTM1L) focuses the signal to nine highly correlated SNPs. Of these, rs36115365-C associated with increased pancreatic and testicular but decreased lung cancer and melanoma risk, and exhibited preferred protein-binding and enhanced regulatory activity. Transcriptional gene silencing of this regulatory element repressed TERT expression in an allele-specific manner. Proteomic analysis identifies allele-preferred binding of Zinc finger protein 148 (ZNF148) to rs36115365C, further supported by binding of purified recombinant ZNF148. Knockdown of ZNF148 results in reduced TERT expression, telomerase activity and telomere length. Our results indicate that the association with chr5p15.33-Region 2 may be explained by rs36115365, a variant influencing TERT expression via ZNF148 in a manner consistent with elevated TERT in carriers of the C allele.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据