4.8 Article

The entangled triplet pair state in acene and heteroacene materials

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15953

关键词

-

资金

  1. G8 Research Councils Initiative on Multilateral Research Funding [EPSRC EP/K025651]
  2. US National Science Foundation [CMM1-1255494]
  3. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science
  4. University of Sheffield
  5. EPSRC [EP/M025330, EP/M01083X]
  6. BELSPO through the PAI P6/27 Functional Supramolecular Systems project
  7. Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research FNRS/F.R.S.
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K21719, 15K05374, 26105001, 26105011] Funding Source: KAKEN
  9. EPSRC [EP/K025651/1, EP/M01083X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K025651/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Entanglement of states is one of the most surprising and counter-intuitive consequences of quantum mechanics, with potent applications in cryptography and computing. In organic materials, one particularly significant manifestation is the spin-entangled triplet-pair state, which mediates the spin-conserving fission of one spin-0 singlet exciton into two spin-1 triplet excitons. Despite long theoretical and experimental exploration, the nature of the triplet-pair state and inter-triplet interactions have proved elusive. Here we use a range of organic semiconductors that undergo singlet exciton fission to reveal the photophysical properties of entangled triplet-pair states. We find that the triplet pair is bound with respect to free triplets with an energy that is largely material independent (similar to 30 meV). During its lifetime, the component triplets behave cooperatively as a singlet and emit light through a Herzberg-Teller-type mechanism, resulting in vibronically structured photoluminescence. In photovoltaic blends, charge transfer can occur from the bound triplet pairs with >100% photon-to-charge conversion efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据