4.7 Article

Stocks and flows of natural capital: Implications for Ecological Footprint

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 123-128

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.033

关键词

Stock vs. flow; Natural capital; Ecological assets; Resource accounting

资金

  1. MAVA Foundation pour la Nature [13/67]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past decade, Ecological Footprint has become one of the most popular and widespread indicators for sustainability assessment and resource management. However, its popularity has been coupled, especially in recent years, by the emergence of critical views on the indicator's rationale, methodology and policy usefulness. Most of these criticisms commonly point to the inability of the Ecological Footprint to track the human-induced depletion of natural capital stocks as one of the main shortcomings of the methodology. Fully addressing this issue will require research efforts and, most likely, further methodological refinements. The aim of this paper is therefore to outline the basis of a new area of investigation in Ecological Footprint research, primarily aimed at implementing the distinction between the use of stocks and the use of flows in Ecological Footprint Accounting and debating its implications. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据