4.7 Article

Samarium doped ceria (SDC) synthesized by a metal triethanolamine complex decomposition method: Characterization and an ionic conductivity study

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 43, 期 13, 页码 9823-9830

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.04.162

关键词

Samarium doped ceria (SDC); Thermal decomposition; Ionic conductivity; Metal triethanolamine complex; Solid conducting electrolyte; Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs)

资金

  1. Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI), Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Thailand
  2. Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Samarium doped ceria (SDC) powders as solid electrolyte ceramics were successfully prepared via thermal decomposition of metal organic complexes containing triethanolamine (TEA) as a ligand. The SDC powders synthesized using various samarium doping contents were characterized by X-ray diffractometry, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis. The influences of samarium doping and the calcination temperature on the characteristics of the SDC materials were thoroughly investigated. An appropriate temperature for SDC powder calcination was identified by thermogravimetric analysis to be 600 degrees C. After sintering the calcined SDC powders at 1500 degrees C to obtain highly dense ceramic pellets, the electrical conductivity of the materials was examined by impedance spectroscopy. The influence of percentage of Sm3+ dopants in SDC materials on the observed conductivity were explained by correlating with the detailed analysis of the local structure and environment of Sm3+ within the SDC materials by using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The conductivities of the SDC products reported in this work indicate that they are promising candidates for solid electrolytes in solid oxide fuel cell applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据