4.7 Article

A Mussel-inspired method to fabricate reduced graphene oxide/g-C3N4 composites membranes for catalytic decomposition and oil-in-water emulsion separation

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 33-45

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.145

关键词

Graphene oxide; g-C3N4 sheet; Dopamine; Oil/water emulsion; Photocatalytic membrane

资金

  1. Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (Southwest Petroleum University) [TLN201617]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the study, the reduced graphene oxide/graphitic carbon nitride sheet membrane (RGO/PDA/g-C3N4) was fabricated by the dopamine modification and assembling the RGO/PDA/g-C3N4 composites on the surface of commercial CA (cellulose acetate) membrane, consisting of an RGO/PDA/g-C3N4-CA composites membrane and RGO/PDA/g-C3N4 free standing membrane. These membrane materials were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) and UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS). The RGO/PDA/g-C3N4 composites membrane achieve to continuous and simultaneous flow -through separation of oil/water emulsion and degradation of soluble organic dye under visible -light irradiation in a short time. The results demonstrate that the flux of RGO/PDA/g-C3N4 composite membrane was strongly influenced by g-C3N4 ratio. With the g-C3N4 ratio increasing, the membrane flux was gradually improved, besides, the separation rate of oil/water emulsion and retention rate of MB (methylene blue) is about 99.5% and 99.8%, respectively. Most important of all, the composite membrane can keep steady flux and high separation and retention efficiency after 5 times of recycling under visible -light irradiation. The composite membrane investigated in this study hope to become an attractive way as promising candidate for water purification. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据