4.7 Article

Acquired MET Y1248H and D1246N Mutations Mediate Resistance to MET Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 16, 页码 4929-4937

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3273

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau [2014Y2-00545, 2011Y2-00014]
  2. Special Fund of Public Interest by National Health and Family Control Committee [201402031]
  3. Key Lab System Project of Guangdong Science and Technology Department-Guangdong Provincial Key of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer [2012A06140006]
  4. National Science Funding of China [81472207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: MET amplification, responsible for 20% of acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), presents an attractive target. Numerous studies have conferred susceptibility of MET mutations and focal amplification to targeted MET-TKIs. However, the mechanism underlying MET-TKIs-induced resistance remains elusive. Experimental Design: We conducted a cohort of 12 patients with advanced NSCLC who developed resistance to a combinatorial therapy consisting of gefitinib and a type I MET-TKI. We performed capture-based targeted ultra-deep sequencing on serial tumor biopsies and plasmas ctDNA samples to detect and quantify genetic alterations. Results: We identified 2 newly acquired MET mutations, Y1248H and D1246N, in 2 patients and further confirmed their resistance against type I MET-TKIs in silco, in vitro, and in vivo. Interestingly, NIH3T3 cells harboring either mutation exhibited responses to type II MET-TKIs, suggesting sequential use of MET-TKIs may offer a more durable response. In addition, we also discovered that EGFR amplification may act as an alternative MET-TKI resistance mechanism. Conclusions: Our study provides insight into the diversity of mechanisms underlying MET-TKI-induced resistance and highlights the potential of sequential use of MET-TKIs. (C) 2017 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据