4.8 Article

A novel SERS-based magnetic aptasensor for prostate specific antigen assay with high sensitivity

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 286-291

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.02.048

关键词

PSA; Magnetic nanoparticles; Aptamer; SEAS; Core-satellite assemblies

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21273083, U1332132]
  2. Guangdong-NSF [S2013010016551]
  3. Project under Scientific and Technological Planning by Guangdong Province [2014A040401075, 2013B090500124, 201510010026]
  4. Project under Scientific and Technological Planning by Guangzhou City [2014A040401075, 2013B090500124, 201510010026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accurate and highly sensitive detection of prostate specific antigen (PSA) is particularly important, especially for obese men and patients. In this report, we present a novel aptamer-based surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERB) sensor that employs magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) core-Au nanoparticles (AuNPs) satellite assemblies to detect PSA. The high specific biorecognition between aptamer and PSA caused the dissolution of the core-satellite assemblies, thus the concentration of functionalized AuNPs (signal probes) existing in the supernatant was on the rise with the continual addition of PSA. The aptamer-modified MNPs were used as supporting materials and separation tools in the present sensor. With the assistance of magnet, the mixture was removed from the supernatant for the concentration effects. It was found that the corresponding SERB signals from the supernatant were in direct correlation to PSA concentrations over a wide range and the limit of detection (LOD) was as low as 5.0 pg/mL. Excellent recovery was also obtained to assess the feasibility of this method for human serum samples detection. All of these results show a promising application of this method. And this novel sensor can be used for the accurate and highly sensitive detection of PSA in clinic samples in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据