4.7 Article

Effects of thermal-Fe (II) activated oxone treatment on sludge dewaterability

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 463-471

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.055

关键词

Waste activated sludge; Dewaterability; Thermal-Fe (II) activated oxone oxidation; Extracellular polymeric substances; Size-exclusion chromatography; Different activation methods

资金

  1. Sustainable Earth Office, Nanyang Technological University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The enhanced dewaterability of waste activated sludge (WAS) by thermal, Fe (II), or thermal-Fe (II) activated oxone treatments was systematically investigated and compared. It was noted oxone oxidation induced by Fe (II) at the lowest tested temperature (25 degrees C) was more effective than any tested temperature alone induced oxone oxidation (25-80 degrees C). Temperature at mesophilic range can enhance the efficiency of Fe (II)-oxone treatment by 20%. Further increase of temperature to higher than 35 degrees C, e.g. 50 degrees C, did not remarkably improve the filterability of sludge in Fe (II)-oxone experiment. On the other hand, the worst performance was from thermophilic condition (80 degrees C) in Fe (II)-oxone experiment. The results demonstrated a significant combined effect of Fe (I1)-oxone on improving sludge dewaterability within mild temperature ranging from 25 to 35 degrees C. Higher sludge filterability and flowability, as well as lower sludge viscosity were observed after treatment. The improvement of sludge dewaterability was achieved by removal of organic compounds in loosely-bound (LB) and tightly-bound (TB) extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Furthermore, the improved sludge filterability was strongly correlated with the removal of dissolved organic matter (DOC), tyrosine-like proteins and fulvic acid-like materials in LB EPS. Economic analysis suggested the mesophilic Fe (II)-oxone treatment was promising for improving WAS dewaterability compared with the conventional thermal treatment. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据