4.8 Article

Probing cytoskeletal modulation of passive and active intracellular dynamics using nanobody-functionalized quantum dots

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14772

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation STW
  2. Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM)
  3. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [NWO-NANO 11421]
  4. NWO [NWO-ALW-VICI 865.10.010, NWO-ALWVIDI 864.12.008]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [336291]
  6. European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) Long-Term Fellowship (EMBO) [ALTF 884-2011]
  7. Marie Curie IEF (FP7-PEOPLE-IEF)
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Emmy-Noether Programm [Ml1923/1-1]
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [336291] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cytoplasm is a highly complex and heterogeneous medium that is structured by the cytoskeleton. How local transport depends on the heterogeneous organization and dynamics of F-actin and microtubules is poorly understood. Here we use a novel delivery and functionalization strategy to utilize quantum dots (QDs) as probes for active and passive intracellular transport. Rapid imaging of non-functionalized QDs reveals two populations with a 100-fold difference in diffusion constant, with the faster fraction increasing upon actin depolymerization. When nanobody-functionalized QDs are targeted to different kinesin motor proteins, their trajectories do not display strong actin-induced transverse displacements, as suggested previously. Only kinesin-1 displays subtle directional fluctuations, because the subset of microtubules used by this motor undergoes prominent undulations. Using actin-targeting agents reveals that F-actin suppresses most microtubule shape remodelling, rather than promoting it. These results demonstrate how the spatial heterogeneity of the cytoskeleton imposes large variations in non-equilibrium intracellular dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据